Good and Bad of Healthcare Facility Rac Review

Updated CMS RAC Report

A June xiv report from CMS titled The Medicare RAC Plan: Update to the Evaluation of the Three-twelvemonth Demonstration indicates that providers accept been winning more appeals since the last updated report was released.  The new report compiles statistics through March 9 and indicates that the number of appeals claims dropped significantly from the 118,051 reported in January, down to 76,073 (or 12.seven percentage of the RAC determinations fabricated in the demonstration programme).  This is in part due to the fact that claims no longer are being counted individually at each level of appeal, but rather counted just once if appealed at any level. Even with the omission of this first-level appeals data, the numbers all the same reverberate that when providers chose to appeal claims, they often were successful: of the 76,073 claims appealed, according to CMS's calculations, 48,993 were overturned, representing an overall success rate of 64.iv percentage. This represents a clear success for providers, indicating that pursuing appeals is worthwhile.

According to the report, the changes occurred because of several shifts in data calculation:

• The prior method of compiling claims counted claims appealed to multiple levels at each stage of entreatment. The revised method at present counts each appealed merits once regardless of whether information technology was appealed through multiple stages.
• Indistinguishable claims at present are identified and removed.
• Appeals withdrawn past the provider too are removed from the full.
• Claims reversed by the claims-processing contractor when additional documentation was submitted also were removed from the total.

The updated report shows that providers are winning a significantly college percentage of appeals than had been indicated past previous reports; providers had a 64.four percent success rate in the new report, compared to 34 percentage in the previous report. It would appear that providers also are experiencing a higher success rate as they accelerate through the higher levels of appeal, particularly at the Administrative Constabulary Approximate (ALJ) level. There even still may be claims decided favorably that take non been included in these statistics. The Authoritative Law Judges were overwhelmed by the volume of appeals they received during the sit-in project.

Providers notwithstanding are receiving favorable decisions on appeals of findings identified during the sit-in program that would non have been included in the nearly recent CMS data, so the information is probable to change again in future updates. This all should be encouraging news for providers equally they make decisions on whether or not to pursue appeals of findings identified in the permanent program.

RACTrac Outset Quarter 2010 Results

On June 22, the American Hospital Association (AHA) released its showtime-quarter 2010 report on the impact of the Recovery Inspect Contractor (RAC) program on member hospitals. Titled Exploring the Impact of the RAC Plan on Hospitals Nationwide: Results of AHA RACTrac Survey, January -March 2010, the study collected data from more than 650 hospitals, revealing many valuable results for participating facilities, the AHA and state hospital associations, which will apply this information to educate the field and inform CMS and Congress of changes needed to the program.

Here are some of RACTrac'south findings; a more detailed study is available on the AHA Spider web site.

Information collected from 653 hospitals in April 2010 shows that:

• More than two-thirds of hospitals participating in RACTrac are experiencing RAC activeness.

• Since 2009, all types and sizes of hospitals accept been subject to RAC review.

• More 3-fourths of participating hospitals in Regions B and C reported RAC activity; Region C had the highest number of hospitals reporting RAC activity.

• $2.47 1000000 in denied claims was reported amid the 437 hospital respondents experiencing RAC activity during the kickoff quarter of 2010; Region C had 47 percent of the reported denials.

• RACs primarily are engaging in complex reviews.

• Outpatient coding and billing were oft a target for automated reviews, while inpatient coding was a mutual target for complex reviews.

---

• Medical record requests represented the bulk of RAC action experienced by responding hospitals during the first quarter of 2010.

• Region C had the highest number of medical records requested in the offset quarter of 2010 among reporting hospitals, with more than 4,500, an boilerplate of 28 per reporting infirmary.

• RACTrac respondents reported complex reviews of medical records totaling more than $117 million in Medicare payments nationwide and $72 meg for Region C solitary

• Of the aforementioned $2.47 million in denied claims,
  • 87 pct of denied payments resulted from circuitous denials.
  • Region C had the highest number of hospitals reporting denied claims, including both complex and automated denials.
  • Two-thirds of hospitals reporting automated denials experienced denials for outpatient coding and billing errors, while nigh all hospitals reporting complex denials experienced denials for inpatient coding errors.
  • The average value of an automatic deprival was $709, and the average value of a complex denial was $6,542.

• Eighty-four percent of responding hospitals reported that their RAC impacted their organisation during the beginning quarter of 2010, whether they experienced RAC reviews or not.
  • Forty-nine percent of responding hospitals reported increased administrative costs.
  • Managing the RAC process was spread beyond many types of hospital staff, creating meaning authoritative brunt.
  • Clerical and other types of staff, including RAC coordinators, spent the well-nigh time responding to RAC activity.
  • Hospitals are using both internal and external resources to prepare and manage RAC activity.
  • Seventeen percent of hospitals using external resources reported spending an average of $91,636 to hire an external utilization management consultant.

second Quarter RACTrac Data Collection Menstruum Begins July 1

Beginning July 1 and running through July 23, RACTrac volition collect data from hospitals regarding their interactions with RACs during the 2d quarter of 2010. Providers are invited to attend AHA's RACTrac quarterly webinar on July 14 to review survey results and learn how your organisation can experience the benefits of the survey and continue to contribute to the success of the AHA's advocacy efforts. Register now at: https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/444536112.

Nearly the Author

Carla Engle, MBA, is a product manger for MediRegs, a Wolters Kluwer visitor. Her background includes more than than 20 years in infirmary and medico exercise operations, particularly in reimbursement and billing functions. Prior to joining Wolters Kluwer recently, she was the vice president of compliance for a national revenue wheel solutions company and prior to that was in the Reimbursement Training Department with HCA.  For several years she headed up the Part A Fraud Investigation Unit for a CMS Program Safeguard Contractor (PSC) where she was successful in the prosecution of several national cases. In her revenue bike compliance chapters, she worked with a number of clients in California and Florida with Recovery Inspect Contractors (RACs) in setting upwardly processes and appeals.

Contact the Writer

carla.engle@wolterskluwer.com

References:

The Medicare RAC Programme: Update to the Evaluation of the Three-twelvemonth Demonstration http://www.cms.gov/RAC/Downloads/DemoAppealsUpdate61410.pdf

Exploring the Impact of the RAC Program on Hospitals Nationwide: Results of AHA RACTrac Survey, January -March 2010

http://www.aha.org/aha/content/2010/pdf/Q1RACTracResults.pdf

mayfieldracke1957.blogspot.com

Source: https://racmonitor.com/racs-good-news-bad-news-appeals-and-rac-activity-up/